"Bernard Rankin" <[email protected]> wrote
http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html
Is:
from subprocess import Popen
output = Popen(["mycmd", "myarg"], stdout=PIPE).communicate()[0]
Really the replacement for:
output = `mycmd myarg`
Yes, because it works more consistently and reliably across
operating systems for one reason. Its also much more powerful
and flexible.
Is there a less verbose, yet still official supported, way to
capture STDOUT from a different program?
os.popen and the commands module still work, they are
just deprecated. It is better to get used to subprocess
although it is more verbose. But at least it can do all the things
you need so you don't need to juggle between backticks,
popen(all 4 versions of it!), spawn, system,commands, etc...
Remember that in the zen of Python :
a) There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do
it.
b) explicit is better than implicit.
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/
HTH,
--
Alan Gauld
Author of the Learn to Program web site
http://www.freenetpages.co.uk/hp/alan.gauld
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
