Lie,
>> Here's what I get:
>>
>> >>> print( 3, 4 )
>> 3 4
> Are you sure it isn't python 3.x you're playing with? The reason why simple
> print function "works" in python 2.x is because of a syntactical
coincidence, it is still a 100% statement.
Yes, I'm sure :) I restarted IDLE and pasted my session output below:
<quote>
Python 2.6.1 (r261:67517, Dec 4 2008, 16:51:00) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32
Type "copyright", "credits" or "license()" for more information.
****************************************************************
Personal firewall software may warn about the connection IDLE
makes to its subprocess using this computer's internal loopback
interface. This connection is not visible on any external
interface and no data is sent to or received from the Internet.
****************************************************************
IDLE 2.6.1
>>> from __future__ import print_function
>>> print( 3, 4 )
3 4
>>>
</quote>
Malcolm
----- Original message -----
From: "Lie Ryan" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:15:01 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [Tutor] Simple PassGen
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:43:18 -0500, python wrote:
> Kent,
>
>> Except they are not equivalent when you want to print more than one
>> thing. ...
>> Python 2.6:
>> In [1]: print(3, 4)
>> (3, 4)
>
> I'm running Python 2.6.1 (32-bit) on Windows XP.
>
> I don't get the tuple-like output that you get.
>
> Here's what I get:
>
>>>> print( 3, 4 )
> 3 4
Are you sure it isn't python 3.x you're playing with? The reason why
simple print function "works" in python 2.x is because of a syntactical
coincidence, it is still a 100% statement.
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
