Thank you all. It was not easy to decide what to learn/use, so I "Google" some more.
I have found that PyQT is more stable, faster, more consistent and more expensive :). 400 € is too much for playing around with some GUI, but GPL licence resolves that issue. The cons are C++ oriented documentation, editor and some structures ... Neven --------------- On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:10 AM, johnf <jfabi...@yolo.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 04 March 2009 04:56:37 pm Alan Gauld wrote: > > "Kent Johnson" <ken...@tds.net> wrote > > > > > I've heard good things about Dabo, never tried it myself though. > > > http://dabodev.com/ > > > > I looked at Dabo but decided not to try it since it was yet another > > framework. Although it's based on wxPython they have layered their > > own widgets on top which is what the GUI Builder uses. (PythonCard > > fell into the same hole) > > Yes, it's true that Dabo has wrapped (subclassed) most of the controls. The > purpose of course was to provide developer ease of use. If you are > building > a real business app then I doubt there is anything better in the python > world. I personally have used both VB and Delphi and see Dabo on the same > level. With one exception - we have a beta GUI builder. Everything that > has > been done in Dabo is the very same things that all developers would be > required to do if they access a database and associate fields to controls. > BTW there is nothing stopping a Dabo developer from directly using wx > controls. Dabo prevents nothing. > > So Alan, I don't see my work as falling into any hole. > > > > But the web pages and writeup looked good and the forum seemed > > to be active and not all negative. > > > > Alan G > > > > > -- > John Fabiani > _______________________________________________ > Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor >
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
