On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:10 AM, David Hutto <smokefl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I get this with yours and Evert's modification from mult to div, but > if you're right, then the 10e18 the book states as a checker is a > typo/error. >
Wait.. in your original e-mail you said the answer as given by the book was 10**18, not 10e18 (which is of course 10 * 10**18). But either way, I'd consider 5e18 a correct answer, since it's fairly close to 1e18 (relatively anyway, it's still 5 times as big). At least there is not an order of magnitude difference anymore. Hugo _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
