Whoops. Hit reply only again. Sorry terry. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Mark Lybrand" <mlybr...@gmail.com> Date: Nov 19, 2011 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [Tutor] The Perennial 3.2 vs 2.7 To: "Terry Carroll" <carr...@tjc.com>
Based on what everyone has said and the fact that my learning material is for 3, I think I will be okay learning 3 and will stumble into the gotchas as I develop with 2.7. Luckily my experience as a programmer should keep me warm at night :) Mark PS. I shall resist the temptation to force python to use curly braces and will learn to embrace indentation. On Nov 19, 2011 10:51 AM, "Terry Carroll" <carr...@tjc.com> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Wayne Werner wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Mark Lybrand <mlybr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> so, use my 2.7 and not my 3.2 for my study? Or use my 3.2 for >> study and then do what I have to in 2.7 after including those >> lines? >> >> Honestly it probably doesn't matter. Many 3rd party libraries have now >> been ported to Python 3.x, so unless you have a particular library you're >> interested in, I would start with 3.2 until you find something you can't do. >> > > Personally, that's the biggy for me, and why I remain on 2.7. wxPython > has not yet been ported to Python 3, and that's a substantial big deal for > me. > > ______________________________**_________________ > Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/tutor<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor> >
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
