On 19/07/13 10:18, Jim Mooney wrote:
On 18 July 2013 10:27, Hs Hs <ilhs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
(sorry this is not homework question. I want to avoid looping, because I
have 300K lines to parse through)
Thanks
Hs.
Not sure what you want to do. If you only want to fulfill the test once,
here is a way without a loop, using a list comprehension.
A list comprehension *is* a loop. It even includes a "for" inside it.
I really don't understand why people so often say things like "I have a bunch of stuff to do
repeatedly, but I want to do it without a loop". To put it another way, "I want to repeat
something without repeating it". WTF???
The only way to avoid a loop *somewhere* is to have a parallel-processing
computer with at least as many parallel processes as you have things to repeat.
So if Hs has 300K lines to process, he would need 300K processors, one per
line. Since that's impractical unless you're Google or the NSA[1] you're going
to need a loop, the only question is whether it is an *explicit* loop or an
*implicit* loop.
For example, a standard for-loop:
for line in many_lines:
process(line)
or a list-comprehension:
[process(line) for line in many_lines]
are explicit loops. The map built-in is implicit:
map(process, many_lines)
So are many of numpy's array functions. But regardless of whether *you* write
the loop, or Python does it for you, there is still a loop.
[1] Hi guys!
--
Steven
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
