On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Here is a poor man’s pure-python re-implementation of `for`:
> https://gist.github.com/Kwpolska/8488091

This will be very handy the next time I run out of for's, or have a
surplus of while's. Fairly common.

Seriously though, thanks for your comments.

-- 
Keith
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist  -  [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor

Reply via email to