On 28 March 2013 02:47, Raymond Jennings <shent...@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally I think mainlining will get development done *faster* > > For starters we'd get a lot more exposure to a wider testing base. > > >
This is true, however a pretty rigid release cycle would be imposed upon tux3 as a result. But then again local branchs will insulate that. Doubt the testing base would be that large for some time, people tend to be cautious of filesystems for good reasons > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Ronnie Collinson <notthink...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> At this point, would mainlining, decrease development pace? If so I >> would suggest this may not be the wisest approach in the very short >> term, ultimately the longer mainlining is left, the more challenging >> and less likely it will be to succeed. Guess its balancing between the >> two. >> >> On 27 March 2013 21:45, Raymond Jennings <shent...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> By the way...I tried btrfs >>> >>> it sucked ass and was slow as hell. >>> >>> Lots of stuff got stuck on endio >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tux3 mailing list >>> Tux3@phunq.net >>> http://phunq.net/mailman/listinfo/tux3 _______________________________________________ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@phunq.net http://phunq.net/mailman/listinfo/tux3