On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 04:14 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Lovely sounding argument, but it is wrong because Tux3 still beats XFS > even with seek time factored out of the equation.
Hm. Do you have big-storage comparison numbers to back that? I'm no storage guy (waiting for holographic crystal arrays to obsolete all this crap;), but Dave's big-storage guy words made sense to me. -Mike _______________________________________________ Tux3 mailing list Tux3@phunq.net http://phunq.net/mailman/listinfo/tux3