Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wednesday 19 November 2008 04:17, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> Unfortunately, quick search was right. SLUB didn't warn by
>> test. (probably, I should send a patch to lkml) So, I tweaked malloc()
>> like the following.
>> 
>> might_sleep() is only for CONFIG_SLUB. And we would like to use
>> GFP_NOFS, not GFP_KERNEL.
>> 
>> If it's ok, please pull again. Thanks.
>
> There is no real harm in harm in having an extra might_sleep for now.
> Let's just leave that one the way you originally had it instead of
> adding a new IFDEF.  Please shout if that is not convenient (i.e.,
> already committed more to your local repo).  I was just curious why
> you saw the need and now we know: it was inadvertently left out of
> SLUB.

Ok. I'll leave might_sleep as is, and will be queueing GFP_NOFS for next
series later.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
Tux3 mailing list
[email protected]
http://tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3

Reply via email to