Hi,
second part of my patch. As the note says, this is untested for multiple
xattrs.
Hirofumi and I just noticed another problem with the xattrs, so the last
patch may be faulty. So please don't apply that yet as further research
is needed.
# HG changeset patch
# User Jonas Fietz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Date 1228158752 -3600
# Node ID 746bbab5b39fc4755c316b368494e4031a67cecd
# Parent 41fb4940acadb1cfd095bfeb68ea625b428dc1d6
Implementation of tux3_listxattr.
Quite simple, as it only has to patch through to xattr_list. This is still
untested for multiple xattrs as there are further problems with those
diff -r 41fb4940acad -r 746bbab5b39f user/tux3fuse.c
--- a/user/tux3fuse.c Mon Dec 01 19:41:33 2008 +0100
+++ b/user/tux3fuse.c Mon Dec 01 20:12:32 2008 +0100
@@ -613,8 +613,25 @@
static void tux3_listxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, size_t size)
{
- warn("not implemented");
- fuse_reply_err(req, ENOSYS);
+ fprintf(stderr, "tux3_listxattr(%Lx, size:%u)\n", (L)ino, (unsigned
int)size);
+
+ struct inode *inode = open_fuse_ino(ino);
+ if(!inode) {
+ fuse_reply_err(req,ENOENT);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ char *buf = malloc(size);
+ if (!buf) {
+ fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ int len = xattr_list(inode, buf, size);
+ fprintf(stderr, "listxattr-buffer:%s\n", buf);
+ fuse_reply_buf(req, buf, len);
+ free(buf);
+ return;
}
static void tux3_removexattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char
*name)
_______________________________________________
Tux3 mailing list
[email protected]
http://tux3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tux3
