On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 23:20 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> I think that's more of a problem when painting near the
> edge of the canvas.
> 
> In any case, I have a solution for this: have the edges of the
> buttons ignore mouse clicks. Two to four pixels should do.

Sounds good.

> I think that one is fairly nice looking (almost the best,
> but not quite) and easy to code. It also will look good
> when the screen is larger -- the gap below is not half as
> ugly as the one that would form when a lovely layout with
> perfect-fitting 2x2 controls is made taller.
> 
> For widths of 912 and up, the buttons follow the color
> buttons in shape and size. For widths of 912 and below,
> the buttons are square. At 1728, they can go back to
> being square (half a color button at that size) again.

I'll take your word for it.

> The button face font can be used. (either it is readable,
> or it isn't -- either way, it's in use right now)

No, I think you missed my meaning.  The more real estate you give to
those buttons, the less there is for messages on the bottom.  It looks
fine with the latin alphabet and English, but is it fine for others?

> How about if those buttons were on the other side, with
> a similar arrangement, instead of wrapped around Tux?

Yes, that might work.  But a few different possibilities spring to mind,
then.  Maybe the font style buttons on the top, flush right, and the
size buttons underneath, also flush right, in a 180 degree rotated
capital L arrangement.  Then the colors would start flush left and span
to the edge of the font style buttons, making room for 18 colors.

Ben


_______________________________________________
Tuxpaint-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxpaint-dev

Reply via email to