On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 10:07:48PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote: > Do the threads work OK on x86, Windows, MacOS X...? >
My system loaded it and reported: 53.323 (with stamps) 5.329 (without) > For maximum effect, compare threaded and non-threaded, > and use the --nostamps option. Running with "--nostamps" (but with "--sysfonts" enabled), the same way as it ran above and loaded in less than 6 seconds, an older version (from 12:30pm PST Jan. 17th), I launched it under "time" and it reported that it took nearly 1m 30s of 'real' time to load (almost 55s of 'user' time). Then it segfaulted. :^/ Fortunately, the currnet version (with "--nostamps --sysfonts") didn't segfault during startup. ;^) HOWEVER, I did notice a segfault right when I hit the 'Quit' button with the current version (when running with "--stamps --sysfonts") :^[ -bill! [EMAIL PROTECTED] April shower bring Kompressor power! http://newbreedsoftware.com/ _______________________________________________ Tuxpaint-dev mailing list [email protected] http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxpaint-dev
