On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Jon Delfin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I gave up on it after a couple of weeks. Did they ever manage to explain why > it was a good idea to put the aggressive spy personality to sleep and have > him masquerade as the meek persona in the meanwhile? That's the part I never > grasped.
I don't think they ever did really give a good rationale for that - and this became more and more of a problem as each week the agency spent more and more time solving problems caused by the agents sleeper families and lives. One clue might be how incapable the agent personalities seemed to be of hiding their killer tendencies and disdainful psychopathic facial and vocal inflections when they were awake. But basically the whole project seemed like a hell of a lot of expense and headache for no perceivable advantage. I think it would have made more sense if the meek personality was the "real" person and the killer persona was the created one. I thought Slater was compelling enough to tolerate the incoherence, but I guess not enough other people did. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Like TV only smarter. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
