On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Chris Neuman <[email protected]> wrote:
> (Of course, in a case of anecdotal knowledge not explaining the general > case, I think the NP problem would not stymie the system in Kevin's case, > though it would be scratching its binary head suggesting something with both > an Aaron Sorkin script and gratuitous T&A at the same time). The math is easy. For starters, the T&A should not be gratuitous, but integral to the plot. If a movie contains Cindy Crawford, T&A would be integral to the plot (we call that the "Fair Game" equation). Sadly, if a movie contains Michael Douglas, his hairy, bobbing man ass is integral to the plot (we call that the "Disclosure" equation). Movies where T&A would have helped the film are too numerous to mention. For example, since the theatrical version of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" had no plot to speak of, T&A was integral, but lacking (we call that the "Higher Learning" equation). Then there is near nudity such as side-boob (the "Wild Things" equation), movies where you are almost certain there is nudity but there really isn't (the "Closer" equation), and unwanted hints at nudity (the "Exit to Eden" equation). All one needs to do is combine those simple equations, and the perfect movie-going experience can be easily attained. See, teens, math can be fun! -- Kevin M. (RPCV) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ TV or Not TV .... Smart (TV) People on Ice! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
