Now that I've seen the opener, I'm ... unconvinced. I'll stick with it awhile to see if this very contrived premise can be justified, but didn't we already go through this a few months ago with Christian Slater?
jd At 12:43 AM 2/14/2009, you wrote: >I heard some of the Lyden interview on "All Things Considered" - she >was laying into Joss pretty good about a supposed about-face on >womens' rights in "Dollhouse" (particularly the notion of 'actives = >prostitutes'). As a fan of Whedon's work, it was a little frustrating >to listen to, especially since Joss' main point was 'don't judge the >series by the pilot, because it goes deeper than that', and Lyden >wasn't having it. It was like she was on a crusade (albeit a mellow, >chilled-out Sunday crusade) to expose Whedon as a fraud of some sort. > >On Feb 13, 5:57 pm, "Mark J." <[email protected]> wrote: >> On one page: Joss chats with David Bianculli on "Fresh Air" today-- >> and, on the same page, with Jacki Lyden on last Sunday's "All Things >> Considered"--and not one highbrow posts a complaining comment about >> NPR dumbing down!: >> >> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=100601869 > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ TV or Not TV .... Smart (TV) People on Ice! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
