On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Phil Collins <[email protected]>wrote:

> Like Dave said if you have to explain the joke, it's not a joke.  Dave did
> the right thing.  Liberals never see wrong when a Conservative is wronged.


The same probably should go for when you're claiming to be offended. Nobody
on earth thought the joke was about Willow Palin (I barely realized that a
Willow Palin even existed before last week). Hell, the target of the joke
was the male -- just like almost every joke where Bristol served as the
pregnant teen prop since August 2008.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shannyn-moore/top-10-reasons-sarah-pali_b_215468.html>Two
years ago, it would have been the sleazy dude knocking up fictional pregnant
teen Juno. Before that, Jamie Lynn Spears. And so one and so forth. To even
think it was personal, and was directed at Willow requires a willful
misrepresentation, and accepting of behavior that is so far out of character
as to be inconceivable. (Now, whether a pregnant teenager should serve as a
prop for philandering jokes is another thing entirely.)  Even if you feel
that David Letterman is cruel to people he does not like, do you really
think he would lash out at their anonymous children? No, he's cruel to them
*directly*.

The thing here is that Sarah Palin has had a long history of making
everything personal against her. It's a known issue in Alaska politics, and
for whatever reason, she felt she could score a quick political point
against Hollywood and become the aggrieved.

Which just leads to aggravation all around.


-- 
Wesley McGee
http://www.ambivi.com
http://sterlingnorth.vox.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
TV or Not TV .... Smart (TV) People on Ice!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to