On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:58 PM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > Now I will go read through the news reports of the day, and probably > find that this afternoon Dave confessed to only allowing Stephanie the > joy of his sexual performance if she agreed to play his fool on the > show....
A quick 15 minutes of surfing yields no real new revelations today. I did see the following statement from WP (http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/TV/10/02/letterman.past.incidents/) "All the relationships David Letterman was referencing when discussing the matter on the 'Late Show' predated his marriage to Regina" That is worded carefully enough that it does seem to leave the door open for some diddling after the birth of his son but before the marriage, and I did see some rumors of SB babysitting Harry during the period she was assumed to be sleeping with Dave - which if true arguably advances Dave further down the road to sleazehood. Still, based on what was revealed last night, I don't see any reason to think Dave is a sleazebag now if you did not think he was a sleazebag before. What we learned about Dave last night is that he has sex with women he is not married too - which I think we already knew about him. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
