It's funny that this is going to the high court, meanwhile a kid can go buy the unrated version of Saw and not get hassled.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote: > In order to legally prevent a child from buying video games containing > violence, doesn't one first have to prove the purchase of the video > games directly harms children? > > http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101031/ap_en_ot/us_supreme_court_video_games > -- > Kevin M. (RPCV) > > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- Jason Carpio [email protected] Twitter: wolvie75 Not sent from an iPhone -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
