*That's* the scenario I'm picturing here. Obviously we know nothing more than what's written in the AP piece, but I'm guessing that what they're suggesting is that you get one active stream per account, and if you want more, you're gonna have to pay. But you're right, PGage: if they were to go to a one "box" per account, and if you want more, you're gonna have to pay, I can see a *lot* of people upset with that.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Sean Healy <[email protected]> wrote: > Not only can you watch three movies at the same time, but if you were to > share your credentials with someone outside of your household, they > could also watch something at the same time. And I think that's more > likely the problem. > > I could see a system of paying for one primary device, and then a > nominal cost for each extra device. They need to recover the cost of > six different people sharing the same account somehow. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
