On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Bob in Jersey <[email protected]> wrote: > The nations of the British Commonwealth, meeting in Australia, agree > that heirs to the throne -- after centuries the other way -- need > longer be exclusively male nor non-Catholic... > > http://news.yahoo.com/girl-british-royal-succession-rules-change-103251289.html
That whole idea made my head spin? Since when does the monarchy answer to the commonwealth? When these "reforms" were proposed, was there an option to vote for disposing of the monarchy altogether in the spirit of fairness? -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
