On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:23 PM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > In such a case, everyone would have been telling > the truth, and NBC still would have essentially paid for a news interview > with a convicted man-slaughterer.
As most here know, NBC is a part of my past and I have a tremendous fondness for the people I worked with in beautiful downtown Burbank. It is also worth noting that I was not a fan of Michael Jackson, and certainly not of the hype surrounding his death. However, if NBC gave money to this quack of a doctor (directly or indirectly), the head of MSNBC needs to go, the head of NBC News needs to go, and I'm on the verge of saying the president of the network needs to go. I'd also like to see the FCC (whom I despise) review the licenses of all broadcast networks and conduct an investigation into their respective news divisions and how they have been securing interviews and selecting stories. If the public isn't being served by the license holders, maybe it is time to revoke those licenses. But, again, none of that will happen. We'll just be given another round of Celebrity Apprentice. -- Kevin M. (RPCV) -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
