On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Wesley McGee <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, in a move that's only surprising in the speed that it is happening,
> it has now escalated to the lawyers...
>
>
> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/keith-olbermann-quits-current-tv-lawyers-278146
>
> I'm guessing by the URL slug, THR initially believed KO quit Current
> before posting the current version of the story... which is Olbermann is
> disgruntled but still employed.
>


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/business/media/olbermann-in-a-clash-at-new-job.html

"He (KO) declined Current’s requests to host special hours of election
coverage, apparently out of frustration about technical difficulties that
have plagued his 8 p.m. program, “Countdown.” The channel decided to
produce election shows without him. Mr. Olbermann, however, said he did not
know that, and on Tuesday, the day of the Iowa caucus, the cold war of
sorts reached a flash point. He held a staff meeting even though
“Countdown” had been pre-empted. Perceiving it to be an act of defiance,
David Bohrman, Current’s president, wrote a memo to Mr. Olbermann’s staff
telling them that the anchor had long ago given up the opportunity to
anchor on election nights. “We assumed,” he wrote, that “Keith had
communicated to you.”

“Countdown” was back on the schedule on Wednesday, and Current declined to
comment about Mr. Olbermann’s status at the channel. But the struggle for
control — which Mr. Olbermann talked about on Twitter — hints at turmoil
behind the scenes at Current and highlights how hard it can be to build big
media brands around unpredictable personalities.(SNIP)

When the channel put on Iowa caucus coverage without Mr. Olbermann on
Tuesday, it was derided by online commenters as cheaply produced; “the
production values were only slightly better than local public access,”
wrote Jonah Goldberg of the conservative National Review, calling it
“hilarious.” (SNIP) Mr. Olbermann did not directly cite production values
as a reason for his absence, but he said in a statement to The Hollywood
Reporter, “I was not given a legitimate opportunity to host under
acceptable conditions.” (SNIP)

-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en

Reply via email to