I never listen to Rush Limbaugh, and rarely pay much attention to the summaries of his radio show comments that appear in various media sources, as I assume he mostly says outrageous things just for the ink. But my email was blown up today with notes from various (admittedly liberal) sources about his recent remarks about Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown Law student who "testified" at the shadow hearing on President Obama's regulation that employers cover the cost of contraception (the amendment to overturn this was defeated in the Senate today).
Apparently Limbaugh called Fluke a slut for (once run through his distorted, labyrinthine processor) that she wanted the US taxpayer to pay for her to have sex; then backed it up today by saying that if Fluke and her fellow Feminazis have their birth control paid for, they should be required to post videos of themselves having sex on the internet so "we" get our money's worth. (see: http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/01/10552338-limbaugh-contraception-advocate-should-post-online-sex-videos ). My question, for anyone here who monitors Limbaugh: Is this just more of his throwing out the red meat to get attention, or has Limbaugh just gone off the deep end? At a distance, these comments seem to suggest that Limbuagh is following Pat Buchanan into the land of those who have lost their bearings, and can no longer tell the difference between outrageous and abhorrent. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
