On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Mark Jeffries <[email protected]>wrote:
> The thing is--does he mean it or is he just blowing smoke?: > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/03/rush-limbaugh-apologizes-to-sandra-fluke_n_1318718.html?utm_campaign=030312&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Alert-media&utm_content=FullStory > > As I noted in the other thread, given that he still didn't bother to read up on what was actually in Fluke's testimony, even though she was on several television networks to give an executive summary (and I know the full testimony is out there, too), and that he still goes out to attack her (still on the erroneous assumption that she was testifying that she needed the coverage to cover her own use of contraception to prevent pregnancy), I say he doesn't mean it, and he doesn't care beyond saving his advertising. -- Wesley McGee http://www.ambivi.com http://sterlingnorth.vox.com http://drawing-a-blank.tumblr.com Twitter: @westwit G+: http://plus.google.com/113413697748381364954 Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/wesleymcgee -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
