On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:13 AM, televisiongirl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I watched this week's NCIS last night. >> >> S >> P >> O >> I >> L >> E >> E >> R >> >> S >> P >> A >> C >> E >> >> H >> E >> R >> E >> >> It was a series with a fully functional set that has served them for a >> decade. That ending was just a shameless act by the bored production >> team to justify erecting a new home base for the characters. >> >> > > 1. Feel better Kevin.
Thanks. Doesn't look like the infection spread to the joints, so no scalpel-jockeys carving me up... yet. Not wild about the lack of skin on my thumb or the discoloration and oozing which are byproducts of the lack of skin. Hoping the antibiotics do their thing. > 2. I also thought it covered them with David McCallum's, Pauley Perrette's > and Michael Weatherly's contracts being up. McCallum has since signed and > Perrette and Weatherly were not only at CBS's Upfront presentation but at > the post-presentation party with the advertisers but still, if new contracts > couldn't be agreed to, they're covered. I've said before how much I like NCIS, but the more I reflect on the finale, the less pleased I am with it. A true cliffhanger is one where the story is interrupted, but that isn't the case here. We know who the bad guy is. There is nothing left to resolve other than the death toll, and that question gets answered 30 seconds into the next episode, at which point a new story unfolds. It is the JJ Abrams method of non-cliffhangers, and NCIS is capable of better. -- Kevin M. (RPCV) -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
