I was not watching CNN this morning, but according to the HuffPost:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/28/cnn-supreme-court-health-care-individual-mandate_n_1633950.htmlboth
they and Fox News jumped to the wrong conclusion when the decision was
first released this morning, announcing that the Affordable Care Law had
basically been overturned"

"Wow, that's a dramatic moment," Wolf Blitzer said, as a chyron saying
"SUPREME CT. KILLS INDIVIDUAL MANDATE" flashed on the screen. "The Justices
have just gutted, Wolf, the centerpiece provision of the health care law,"
John King said, adding that it was a "direct blow to President Obama."

A few minutes later they had to reverse and correct themselves: Later,
Boulduan returned to correct the initial report: "'It's a huge, huge
victory for President Obama' Blitzer said."

Apparently Fox News went through a very similar sequence.

CNN justified the mistake by saying:  "the Court had released a "very
confusing large opinion"; they  said that the decision was "thick" and
"legally dense," scanning the papers on-air."

This is basically bullshit. I do understand why CNN initially thought the
opinion was going against Obamacare. I have read the first ten pages of the
opinion (the full opinion is 193 pages long, you can read it too at
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/28/supreme-court-health-care-reform-ruling_n_1605393.html)
and it begins with Chief Justice Roberts announcing that the individual
mandate is not a valid exercise of congressional power under the commerce
clause of the constitution. Legal analysis had largely turned on this
point, and it was widely assumed that if the court failed to justify the
law under the commerce clause it would rule against it. But less than two
pages later Roberts clearly explains that the mandate is permissible under
the federal government's taxing authority.

I timed myself, and it took my one minute and 44 seconds to get to page 4
of the opinion where this is stated. Granted, by that time I already knew
what was coming, but certainly informed reporters and legal analysts could
have gotten there in, say 5 minutes, or even 10, on a first reading? All
the cable newscasts had to do was take those 5 or 10 minutes to read the
damn opinion, clearly the most important Supreme Court decision in the last
decade, one of the most importatant in the last half century, before
announcing to the world something that was not just wrong, but the exact
opposite of what was right.

This should be more than just a little sidebar, mildly embarrassing. This
should be a major humiliation. CNN should fear that viewers will no longer
tune in to them to get credible information about important stories, since
they can not be trusted to get it right. Nothing should be more important
to the people who run CNN than making sure that something like this never,
ever happens. But of course in the contemporary climate, being accurate is
way down the list of priorities at CNN.

-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en

Reply via email to