I don't see why they can't move the first game of the day back half an hour or even an hour. Will less people watch games starting at 9am or 9:30am instead of 10am? Or noon instead of 1pm if one is on the East Coast?
I, personally, would rather have it start earlier. I could then more easily watch the first game, go out for the afternoon, and watch the second game in the evening when I got home. PS: I also don't actually watch NFL games live. I wait until they've been going for a while so I can skip the repeats of every play and the commercials. That 30-second skip button is perfect for skipping to the next play as soon as a play is over. -- David Risner On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 2:44 AM, JW <[email protected]> wrote: >> I haven't heard of the NFL increasing commercial time allowed during games >> this season. > > Neither have I, but don't new TV contracts kick in next year? > > I'm a little surprised they don't just start games at 1 and 4:30 > Eastern. Although I suppose that NBC wants to see the live games end > as early as possible so as not to compete with FNIA. > > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
