On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:21 AM, David Bruggeman <[email protected]> wrote: > I got more of an Amy Goodman vibe from the whole piece, but YMMV.
Good for you. I gave up after the first page. I have experience as an activist. If you choose to be an activist and you are not certain that your cause is just or right, then you are a fool and you will not have the grit and commitment to succeed when facing your better-funded opponents. On the other hand, if you are an activist and you are so convinced that you are right and anybody who disagrees with your slogans, strategy, or tactics is a sellout and is as evil as your opponents, you will end up sitting in a room with three other people who agree with you and the extent of your activism will be to complain about how everybody sucks. A writer can claim that Stewart and Colbert are not worthy of their accolades and why not? Stewart and Colbert are not responsible for the accolades (I mean they are not in control of that) so to deem them unworthy is fair and not an attack on their work. To denigrate their work because they work for a corporation and therefore whatever they write is compromised goes too far. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
