Back in July of 2010, Kevin M wrote: > > He's suing over money he feels he is owed from "Nash Bridges," that is > neither here nor there. The bit that sent my blood boiling was this > part of the story: > > "He told jurors that the bulk of his 'earning potential' had been over > a period of about 15 years, and that spread out over a lifetime, his > income may be similar to an average person's earnings." > > Assuming $10 million per year over 15 years (which is conservative), > Johnson made $150,000,000 in that period. Divided by 50 years, he made > $3,000,000 annually. Assuming my conservative estimates are off by > half and he only earned $5 million, he still averages out to $1.5 > million over a 50 year span. If I'm 75% off, he still gets > upper-six-figures annually. > > Don Johnson is an ass if he truly believes that is an average person's > earnings. I hope the jurors do the basic math and come to the same > conclusion. > TheWrap<http://www.thewrap.com/tv/column-post/don-johnsons-payout-nash-bridges-case-reduced-35m-58706>: "But Rysher appealed, alleging jury misconduct and that the amount of interest to which Johnson was entitled was calculated incorrectly. ... Monday (10/1/12), the California Court of Appeal agreed with Rysher, saying Johnson should receive just $15 million, plus interest as of July 2010, when the verdict was handed down."
-- BOB -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
