In Baltimore ABC (2) and NBC (11) used subchannels. CBS (13) showed news as there are no subchannels. FOX (45) run shows in primary channel. [subchannel showed "This" halloween movies.
Mark On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:02 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Today's Topic Summary > > Group: http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/topics > > - World Series Shits to Detroit <#13ab5d7ff43d0e61_group_thread_0> [5 > Updates] > - JK is indeed live <#13ab5d7ff43d0e61_group_thread_1> [1 Update] > - Late Night Starting Lineups <#13ab5d7ff43d0e61_group_thread_2> [5 > Updates] > - back channels <#13ab5d7ff43d0e61_group_thread_3> [5 Updates] > - Semi-OT: Disney buys Lucas <#13ab5d7ff43d0e61_group_thread_4> [4 > Updates] > - NBC Mid-Season: New Pullman SItcom and Longoria Reality, 'Smash' > Moves to Tues. and Loses 'Voice" > Protection<#13ab5d7ff43d0e61_group_thread_5>[1 Update] > - 'Community' Bends Over to Get Another Whupping from 'Big > Bang'<#13ab5d7ff43d0e61_group_thread_6>[3 Updates] > - 'Anderson Live' Dead <#13ab5d7ff43d0e61_group_thread_7> [1 Update] > > World Series Shits to > Detroit<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/fb469fb332ab9cdc> > > Dave Sikula <[email protected]> Oct 30 11:23AM -0700 > > Not to beat a dead horse, but > > Scutaro with Colorado: .271/.324/.361 OPS .684 OPS+73, with SF: > .362/.385/.473 OPS .859 OPS+145 > > So, yeah; I guess he did. > > --Dave Sikula > > On Monday, October 29, 2012 11:21:49 PM UTC-7, PGage wrote: > > > > > PGage <[email protected]> Oct 30 06:17PM -0700 > > > > Scutaro with Colorado: .271/.324/.361 OPS .684 OPS+73, with SF: > > .362/.385/.473 OPS .859 OPS+145 > > > So, yeah; I guess he did. > > > I will assume you have completed similar comparisons for the top 3 > hitters > on all other playoff teams and found no other similar improvements. > > > > > Michael <[email protected]> Oct 30 10:28PM -0700 > > Wow, Someone (perhaps a Yankees or Dodgers fan) is really jumping to > some amazing and specious conclusions. PEDs are an MLB-wide problem, > but the team average for the Giants suggests that Melky was the only > abuser. Slim Giants catcher Buster Posey won the friggin' 2012 batting > title with the highest average in baseball, and all his so-far brief > life, he's been like Jack Armstrong, the All-American Boy. His average > in the post-season was .200, and other than Pablo and Buster hitting a > few HRs, the Giants were mostly cobbling together runs in small-ball > fashion and winning with great pitching on their way to the title. By > the way, I'd venture to say that the only thing Panda is jacked up on > is pie. Tom Verducci of SI picked the Giants to win the Series, and > while they were still in the process of sweeping the Detroit Tigers in > the World Series, he suggested that San Francisco's commemorative > championship DVD should be used as an instructional video for anyone > interested in learning how to play the game the right way. This is an > incredibly colorful, charismatic, dedicated team that has played the > past season with genuine joy and camaraderie. And I don't expect them > to pull a disappearing act for the benefit of the East Coast-skewed > touts at ESPN, Fox Sports and SI and the other media whiners. Get used > to the Giants, America. > > The NL Champs are on a remarkable and gratifying roll right now. None > of this comes easily, but the joy > > > > > > Michael <[email protected]> Oct 30 11:08PM -0700 > > Wow, Someone (perhaps a Yankees or Dodgers fan) is really jumping > to some amazing and specious conclusions. PEDs are an MLB-wide > problem, but, in general, the Giants' averages suggest that Melky was > the only abuser. Giants catcher Buster Posey won the 2012 > batting title with the highest average in baseball, but he's hardly > 'roided-up. In fact, during Posey's so-far brief life, the only > Armstrong he's been like is Jack Armstrong, the All-American Boy. His > average in the post-season was .200, and other than Pablo and Buster > hitting a few HRs, the Giants were mostly cobbling together runs in > small-ball fashion and winning with great pitching on their way to the > title. By the way, I'd venture to say that the only thing Panda is > jacked up on is pie. Tom Verducci of SI picked the Giants to win the > Series, and while they were still in the process of sweeping the > Detroit Tigers in the World Series, he suggested that San Francisco's > commemorative championship DVD should be used as an instructional > video for anyone interested in learning how to play the game the right > way. This is an incredibly colorful, charismatic, dedicated team that > has played the past season with genuine joy and camaraderie. And I > don't expect them to pull a disappearing act for the benefit of the > East Coast-skewed touts at ESPN, Fox Sports and SI and the other media > whiners. > > > > > > PGage <[email protected]> Oct 31 12:22AM -0700 > > > some amazing and specious conclusions. PEDs are an MLB-wide problem, > > but the team average for the Giants suggests that Melky was the only > > abuser. (SNIP) > > > I think we are dealing with some predictable Dodger-Fan hate, which is > why > my replies have been so brief and restrained. I have said much less > reasonable things in the wake of Dodger World Series victories (and if > I > have to see that Gibson HR one more time my head might just explode). > > But, to get back to my original, more TV-related point, the Giants > really > have been overlooked by the national media this year, and especially > Fox > Sports. By any objective standard, this team is on the short list of > best > NL World Series teams in the history of MLB. > > The only other time a World Series winner came back from > two consecutive three game to one deficits, winning 6 elimination > games in > a row, was the 1985 KC Royals; it has never been done by an NL team. > The > last time an NL team shut out an AL team twice in a row in the World > Series > was 1919 (and their opponent that year got paid to lose their games). > They > are only the second National League team to ever allow 1 run or less in > three consecutive World Series games (the first was 107 years ago). > This > was arguably the best team pitching performance by a NL team ever. And > only > five other teams in the history of National League have ever won two > World > Series in three years (Cubs in 1907-08; NY Giants in 1921-22; Cardinals > (1942-44; 44-46); LA Dodgers (1963-65); Reds (1975-76); SF Giants > (2010-12). So this is one of the elite WS teams in NL history, > displaying > probably the most dominating pitching performance in NL history, after > mounting the most dramatic and extreme comeback in NL post-season > history, > twice. > > We know Dave was just indulging his inner Blue (I seem to recall that > Dave > lives in NoCal, but is still a Dodger fan, perhaps having grown up down > there, as did I), because the Giants hit the fewest home runs in the NL > this season, and won their division, league and World Series with a > combination of pitching, defense and great managing. We did have two > players suspended for PEDs this year, but the Giants real run began > when > Melky left the team (and they could have put him on the post-season > roster > if they wanted to, since his 50 game suspension was over, but they > chose > not to). I guess the most you could say is that the roids helped us > get the > home field advantage, given Melky's role in winning the All-Star game > - but > as it turned out we hardly need it. > > Having said all that, I do agree with the point that MLB has not yet > completely put the Selig-Era behind it yet, and needs to double-down > on the > consequences for violations. Even a 50 game suspension seems worth it > to a > lot of guys, given the rewards that come with MLB success - especially > players who come from baseball-crazy but desperately poor areas in > Latin > America. I think maybe something like a 162 game suspension would be > appropriate for a first offense, 324 for a second offense, and a third > strike should mean they are out, for good. And they need to test more > often, less predictably, and more extensively. > > > > JK is indeed > live<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/9d253d54e188ab09> > > David Bruggeman <[email protected]> Oct 30 09:45PM -0700 > > Though he does seem to be delayed in the DC area (whether this is > local or national I don't know), with him doing a monologue at about 12:40. > > Dave, Paul or someone else had to call an audible with the musical > guest, but it worked quite well. > > SCG brought out a copy of "Leading With My Chin" during the cold open, > so it should be silly fun. > > David > > > > Late Night Starting > Lineups<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/938d3959fbc13346> > > David Bruggeman <[email protected]> Oct 30 12:08PM -0700 > > A quick perusal of show websites for the NYC-based programs indicates: > > TDS/TCR - both will air repeats (last Thursday's, FWIW) > Letterman and Fallon will air live again tonight. Probably without > audience, but that's just a guess. > Kimmel has Tweeted that he intends to do a show from Brooklyn tonight. > No word one way or the other from the network. > > In other news, Big Jaw sits down with Scottish Conan Guy tonight. > > I have no idea when the show was taped (last night's cold open > demonstrated how much Craig views the calendar as a suggestion rather than > a way to track time). But with Letterman, Stewart and Colbert scheduled to > sit with Kimmel this week, fraternity members haven't been this close to > each other outside of the Emmys in years. > > David > > > > > Steve Timko <[email protected]> Oct 30 02:27PM -0700 > > I haven't seen yesterday's Late Show but the Top 10 list was odd when > no > one laughed. > > > > > Joe Hass <[email protected]> Oct 30 09:27PM -0500 > > Two question after watching Dave last night: > > 1. My wife's: "Is it me or does the show work better without an > audience?" > > 2. Mine: "Am I the only one who would love to have seen how Carson > would've handled this?" > > > > > > "Kevin M." <[email protected]> Oct 30 07:35PM -0700 > > > Two question after watching Dave last night: > > > 1. My wife's: "Is it me or does the show work better without an > audience?" > > Anything that changes up the formula is refreshing > > > 2. Mine: "Am I the only one who would love to have seen how Carson > > would've handled this?" > > Carson wouldn't have done it > > > > -- > Kevin M. (RPCV) > > > > > Ed Dravecky <[email protected]> Oct 30 10:04PM -0500 > > > > 2. Mine: "Am I the only one who would love to have seen how Carson > > > would've handled this?" > > > Carson wouldn't have done it > > Carson could have willed the hurricane back out to sea. > > -- > Ed Dravecky III > http://www.fencon.org/ > > > > back channels<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/df5f4f33a9b80865> > > Jon Delfin <[email protected]> Oct 30 02:27PM -0400 > > Here in the windswept, waterlogged New York City region, where we > continue to endure saturation (!) coverage of the storm and its > aftermath, I'm wondering if ABC and Fox have alternative outlets > available to Time Warner customers as CBS (55 and 755) and NBC (161) > do. Does anyone know? Thanks. > > Jon > > > > > Joe Coughlin <[email protected]> Oct 30 02:37PM -0400 > > Philly's 6ABC ran the usual ABC schedule on their digital subchannel > Live Well Network. You should check your listings for that channel. > > > -- > +++++++++++++++ > Joe Coughlin > http://www.twitter.com/inturnaround > > > > > David Bruggeman <[email protected]> Oct 30 11:41AM -0700 > > Seconded. While tuning in the digital subchannels on the TV directly > is straightforward, figuring out where they are on you cable/satellite > provider's dial is a wholly separate thought process. > > David > > > > > > > > Jon Delfin <[email protected]> Oct 30 02:43PM -0400 > > Ding ding ding ding ding! We have a winner. Live Well is here on 163 > and 687. > > > > > > > > "Terry Knab" <[email protected]> Oct 30 07:49PM -0500 > > ABC is using 6.2 in Philly and 7.2 in NYC to run backup programming > on, so > wherever that livewell garbage is, you'll find ABC backup. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Jon Delfin > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 1:28 PM > To: tvornottv > Subject: [TV orNotTV] back channels > > Here in the windswept, waterlogged New York City region, where we > continue > to endure saturation (!) coverage of the storm and its aftermath, I'm > wondering if ABC and Fox have alternative outlets available to Time > Warner > customers as CBS (55 and 755) and NBC (161) do. Does anyone know? > Thanks. > > Jon > > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To > unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en > > > > Semi-OT: Disney buys > Lucas<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/c3ee32d25e5db3e5> > > "Kevin M." <[email protected]> Oct 30 02:39PM -0700 > > Probably the best decision Disney made since their union with Pixar, > though I think it means Lucas is done producing big budget stuff. > > > > http://thewaltdisneycompany.com/disney-news/press-releases/2012/10/disney-acquire-lucasfilm-ltd > > -- > Kevin M. (RPCV) > > > > > Jason Carpio <[email protected]> Oct 30 05:04PM -0500 > > So does this mean Disney owns ILM, Skywalker sound and the THX license > as > well as all star wars licenses? > > > -- > Jason Carpio > [email protected] > Twitter: wolvie75 > G+: https://profiles.google.com/u/1/115807424212473677796 > > Not sent from an iPhone > > > > > David Risner <[email protected]> Oct 30 03:05PM -0700 > > You seem to have missed the other part of the headline. They are > producing Star Wars Episode 7 to come out in 2015. I haven't seen any > word on whether this will be a whole new story line or will follow any > of the story lines in the myriad books that have come out in the past > few decades. > > -- > David Risner > Software Engineer > MERLOT, California State University > > > > > > > Jason Carpio <[email protected]> Oct 30 05:12PM -0500 > > So disney will have Avengers 2 and Star wars 7, plus a pixar movie. I > say > that's a good year for them. > > > -- > Jason Carpio > [email protected] > Twitter: wolvie75 > G+: https://profiles.google.com/u/1/115807424212473677796 > > Not sent from an iPhone > > > > NBC Mid-Season: New Pullman SItcom and Longoria Reality, 'Smash' Moves > to Tues. and Loses 'Voice" > Protection<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/b56a4f01f7e35e7b> > > Mark Jeffries <[email protected]> Oct 30 02:37PM -0700 > > Besides "Community," Bill Pullman's Presidential sitcom "1600 Penn" > joins > the Thursday night lineup on Jan. 10 at 9:30 (with "Community" to 8 > and > "Parks and Rec" to 8:30 eventually) and Eva Longoria's new dating show > "Ready for Love" starts on Mar. 31 (as a lead-in for "Celeb > Apprentice," > which Birther Trump is already touting as an "all-star" edition) and > Victor > Garber's mystery "Deception" spells "Revolution" on Monday nights as > of > Jan. 7--"Biggest Loser" and "Off Their Rockers" are coming back and > "Smash" > is moving to Tuesday nights and losing that sweet "Voice" lead-in for > its > first six weeks ("Revolution"'s getting that), which may not bode well > for > the show ("Biggest Loser"'s its lead-in and I'm guessing that this > might be > the last season for that show): > > > > http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/nbc-sets-premiere-dates-1600-penn-eva-longoria-series-62776 > > > > 'Community' Bends Over to Get Another Whupping from 'Big > Bang'<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/86ddc0711836fc9b> > > Mark Jeffries <[email protected]> Oct 30 12:15PM -0700 > > According to a tweet from cast member Yvette Nicole Brown, the fanboi > favorite returns for what will probably be its final season with no > movie > on Feb. 7 at 8 p.m., the same time slot last year where "Big Bang > Theory" > kicked its butt--Chuck Lorre and CBS must be celebrating: > > > > http://www.thewrap.com/tv/column-post/community-gets-february-return-date-star-says-62756 > > > > > Joe Coughlin <[email protected]> Oct 30 03:50PM -0400 > > So, when exactly did "Community" physically assault you and call you > names while pouring sugar in your gas tank, Mark? > > > -- > +++++++++++++++ > Joe Coughlin > http://www.twitter.com/inturnaround > > > > > Jim Ellwanger <[email protected]> Oct 30 01:07PM -0700 > > On Oct 30, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Joe Coughlin wrote: > > > So, when exactly did "Community" physically assault you and call you > > names while pouring sugar in your gas tank, Mark? > > > Actually, they and the San Francisco Giants were tag-teaming Mark and > Dave. Brutal. > > -- > Jim Ellwanger <[email protected]> > <http://www.ellwanger.tv> > > > > 'Anderson Live' > Dead<http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/t/8658e61cd8d4cd44> > > donz5 <[email protected]> Oct 30 11:03AM -0700 > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group > tvornottv. > You can post via email <[email protected]>. > To unsubscribe from this group, > send<[email protected]>an empty message. > For more options, visit <http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv/topics>this > group. > > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en > -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
