n Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:
> Admittedly, nobody on Reddit ever seems satisfied with anything, but > the overwhelming response (based on evidence, oddly enough), is Maddow > really only answered the soft-ball questions, entirely avoiding the > most popular questions (many sent by actual fans, not just > conservative trouble-makers), ultimately bailing on the AMA before her > hour was up. > > > http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/19wzss/i_am_rachel_maddow_ask_me_anything/ I thought they were relatively happy with President Obama's AMA. Rachel seems to have made the mistake that too many who try this have in the past - which is not reading over enough of the previous AMAs. I think that community is actually relatively sane compared to most online communities, but they are unforgiving, regardless of POV, of people who refuse to take on all questions. I think even if the answer is something like: "I don't want to answer that question because it will cause personal embarrassment to me, or someone I know" can tone down the backlash. But to just either identify questions that will not be answered or (probably worse) just ignoring certain kinds of questions, drives those guys crazy. I did not actually read the questions she did not answer, so maybe she did try and they are just going after her anyway, but at first glance from the responses it doesnt seem that way. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
