A brief background on how we got here on this, because while the crime
itself is heinous, it's worth noting the circuitous route that was taken to
get here.

The incident occurred in August, but it exploded in December, when the New
York Times wrote an article detailing how much of what happened was
distributed via social networks. The cone of silence around the football
team was so great that it was widely expected that the accused teens would
either have the charges dismissed or reduced significantly. As a local
blogger started digging into the situation more and more, that cone grew
heavier and heavier. Keep in mind that while the accused teens were removed
from the football team, a significant number of other players who were
aware of the situation via said social media were not suspended until late
in the season when the aforementioned blogger  started getting really nosy.
And all during the while, the head football coach ran interference for
everyone, including testifying as a character witness for the accused,
keeping the story out of the local press, and using his connections to do
everything he could to basically make this go away, which he could've done
because he's (of course) a hero in this town.

This story had every evil stereotype you could possibly image when it comes
to jocks overtaking a town completely. I mean this reads like bad fiction
if it weren't so damn true (trust me: when it comes to football, Ohio is on
par with every stereotypical southern state when it comes to unhealthy
local obsession). So when this decision came down on Sunday (which I'm
still trying to figure out why the judge ran this thing through the
weekend), the fact that reporters seemed to suddenly be unable to act like
professionals on a case that was so insanely horrible on so many levels, it
just blew everyone out of the water. It validated every horrible, insane,
dead-wrong feeling about rape and rape culture that exists. The "good guys"
won, and yet we're focusing on how the "bad guys" aren't really so bad? Add
to that the fact that the two reporters are both female (which should be
irrelevant, but isn't), and you've got a good ol' fashioned media inferno.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am shocked, shocked I say, to learn CNN , ABC, NBC, and USA Today
> are all under fire for the way their reporting of two rapists has been
> sympathetic. Harder still is the segment from The Onion two years ago,
> that is freakishly prescient.
>
> http://youtu.be/zWLJZw9Ws-g
>
> --
> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to