I have been convinced the answer to the question in the subject header is
the first alternative since I first saw her on Larry Sanders. I think she
proves it again in her recent HBO Special  "We Are Miracles". Of course,
the same special will confirm the judgement of those who think the answer
is the second alternative too. I won't try to persuade anyone to change
their mind. But I did want to draw attention to the latest round of online
debate about Silverman the special has stimulated, thanks mostly to a
remarkable review in Variety by Brian Lowry:

http://variety.com/2013/tv/columns/sarah-silvermans-bad-career-move-being-as-dirty-as-the-guys-1200834142/

The response is well illustrated by this piece by Ellen Killoran:
http://www.ibtimes.com/sarah-silverman-failure-according-variety-critic-1482438,
in which she writes:

"That Silverman chose to traffic in raunchy, envelope-pushing humor as
opposed to utilizing her good looks seems to be a tragedy in Lowry’s eyes:
“Despite all manner of career-friendly gifts – from her looks to solid
acting chops – she’s limited herself by appearing determined to prove she
can be as dirty and distasteful as the boys …”

Silverman fans and bashers will no doubt take appropriate sides here, but
what really got my attention was the extent to which Lowry either does not
understand the comedy world, or was willing to misrepresent it in order to
make his point, and that is the main point I like in Killoran's rebuttal.
Lowry tries to argue that because Silverman pushes the envelope and
continues to think that saying the "C" word over and over is funny, her
career is a failure, dooming her to work the small room at Largo's in LA
(where the special was filmed). Of course I and other Silverman fans know
that those who think her act is basically saying "cunt" over and over to
get shock laughs are completely and profoundly misunderstanding her, but
that is a different argument. The main point of this argument is that Sarah
Silverman is one of the most successful comics of her generation, and that
the side room at Largo's has a certain significance in the LA comedy scene.

Yes, it is true that Sarah Silverman is pretty and likable enough that she
could probably have a career as the star, or at least co-star, of a
mainstream network sitcom. That she has chosen a different career path does
not necessarily mean she has more integrity that the scores of pretty women
who trade on their looks for easy Hollywood success, but it also does not
make her a failure either. I am not one for knee-jerk feminist bitching,
and I would take issue with those of my fellow Silverman fans who might
accuse everyone who bashes her of sexism; but in the case of Lowry's
critique and others like it, I think the sexist charge is pretty well
warranted. If you don't think she's funny, fine; I never could figure out
why so many people thought that Raymond sitcom was so funny. But if you
think attractive female comics should leave the dirty talk and frank comic
material to men and instead make themselves pretty for network TV, then I'm
afraid you just might be a sexist.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to