> I am sympathetic to Steuver's perspective that Corden's late night persona is an attempt to > out-Fallon Fallon. To put it in terms that Geoff Peterson might use, James Corden is the > Jimmy Fallon fly with a British accent. and > I don't mind panel interviews, butI think a key difference between UK and US attempts is > the hosts in the UK seem to better manage guests talking over each other.
I can see why CBS management thought so highly of Corden; he's talented and likeable. Unfortunately, he's in the wrong vehicle. Doing stand-up for the monologue is a weakness of his, as is interviewing. And the desk/audience comedy pieces don't work for me. If the accent's not too much of an obstacle, he'd be the guy to host a prime time variety show. There are two situations where panel interviews work: (1) The panelists all have something in common that they can discuss, like a Charlie Rose segment. (2) There's a topic that everyone can weigh in on, like a Bill Maher segment. What doesn't work is (3) Trying to conduct three separate interviews by alternating questions among the guests, like a Corden segment. Even if there's something to build on in an answer, the host has to go to the next guest to ask about her movie instead. I wouldn't be surprised if the people who put the show together thought that if an audience member wants to watch one guest, he'll sit through multiple segments while the other guests also answer questions. (I think there's also something to Adam's notion that putting together one panel a week makes it easier to come up with a compatible group than a US show doing four or five a week.) And, like David, the Jimmy Fallon fly has come to my mind while watching Corden treat every guest and every project as "fantastic." I've stopped watched any of Corden. I switch over to Meyers for pseudo-Update and the first comedy bit, especially if it's "A Closer Look." (Whenever I'm tempted to watch more, I'm rudely reminded that Seth and his producers appreciate his time on SNL a lot more than I do.) Then I turn the TV off until it's time for the Carson rerun. > Seriously, thought, a primetime special that is a repackaging of (mostly) clips that have > been online for months makes much less sense that a comparable special for any of the > previous generation of late night programs. That's true, but I suspect that the idea was to show off a program that many prime time viewers haven't stayed up for. There may even be some people who've seen clips online but haven't connected them to The Late Late Show on CBS. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
