On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 8:49 PM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess, but the article said it was to improve ratings. >
But we don't have to take their word for it. We know that people don't like to have their habits disrupted and the results of breaking up Mike and Mike will be a drop in the ratings. If ESPN radio gets lucky it will only be a temporary drop but the idea that people who currently listen to other sports radio shows in the morning will switch to ESPN because they switched hosts makes no sense. Steve's explanation is more logical no matter what an ESPN spokesperson says. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
