On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:
> I didn't need more reasons to despise USA Today, but in the photo caption > they called her a "darling" and in the lede sentence they called her a > "firebrand." She's a clueless fucking racist, but because she's a perky > blonde woman they have to concoct other adjectives that in no way describe > who she is. She is a clueless fucking racist. I'm so sick of media > marginalizing these bigots and sexists and homophobes and islamophobes. > Being a racist is not "alt right," nor is it an opposing view to be given > equal time and equal merit with non-racists. Racism is amoral, uncivilized, > and antisocial. Would USA Today call a guy in a white hood burning a cross > a "darling"? Because that's what they just did with this clueless fucking > racist. > > Hopping off soapbox now. Gonna eat some dinner and watch Maverick reruns. > Racism is immoral, not amoral. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
