Didn't Sir Tom once explain a similar situation a long time ago? Isn't performance of recorded music for profit (in this case, campaign contributions, even while the candidate still holds office) governed by the now-seven or eight music-licencing bodies? Or is the fact that (like almost any candidate) video inevitably occurs or surfaces, leading the songwriter to contend (as he does, three times over) that rights must be granted directly? It's not something I'm expected to remember every day, even with a (sucky) computer available.
THR <https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/aerosmith-music-at-trump-rallies-prompts-cease-desist-letter-1136751> (link) B -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
