It's worth noting Canon will release an 8K dslr in the next few months. We
seem to be moving towards more 8k video.

https://petapixel.com/2020/04/20/canon-unveils-key-eos-r5-specs-dual-is-4k-120fps-no-crop-8k-and-more/


On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, 2:11 AM Adam Bowie <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's all about 16K now...
>
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-47867038
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 11:51 AM Adam Bowie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> For the foreseeable future, I think 8k is just something for people to
>> put on display on trade stands and in large department stores with
>> unfeasible price tags just to say, "Aren't we clever?"
>>
>> You probably need close to 100" screens to make 8k in anyway sensible.
>> And in an increasingly urbanised world, that's an entire wall for many
>> people. I don't think any broadcaster is doing this for ratings reasons -
>> it's the R&D teams seeing what they can do and the company being able to
>> press release it.
>>
>> For consumers, improved screen technology like OLED, HDR and improved
>> audio systems are of far greater near-term impact.
>>
>> I think it's perfectly fine for broadcasters to shoot crown jewel events
>> in things like 8k or 3D. They've always done that. But in no way does it
>> really mean that consumers are going to watch it in any significant number.
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:29 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> How well do these folks think the human eye can see? How much detail do
>>> viewers really want? As a one-eyed guy, I’m grateful the rest of you
>>> rejected 3D media. As a guy with average vision in my one good eye, can we
>>> all stand together by rejecting the expense of a level of image quality
>>> which benefits nobody?
>>>
>>> I swear, inside the offices of network executives, some toady getting
>>> his ass handed to him over declining ratings panicked and, instead of
>>> arguing that the lack of quality in the content of the programming is
>>> leading to the decline, blurted out that viewers were tuning out because
>>> the picture wasn’t clear enough, and the executives were stupid enough to
>>> believe him. To believe 8k is wanted or needed, you have to ignore all the
>>> data which shows the ever increasing amount of people of all ages who watch
>>> media on their phones.
>>>
>>> Law and Order in 8k is still going to be as bland and formulaic as it
>>> was when it was in standard definition in a 4:3 ratio.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 1:11 PM Steve Timko <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Industry article says 8K is on its way.
>>>>
>>>> LINK <https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/ready-or-not-here-comes-8k>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:57 PM Tom Wolper <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 5:13 AM Adam Bowie <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> For what it's worth, I tend to think that investing in a decent sound
>>>>> system is the best way to up the quality and really envelop you, rather
>>>>> than work out if you can even get a 100" TV into your home!
>>>>>
>>>>> If people here don't know this, decent quality speakers need physical
>>>>> depth which is not provided in thin flat screen TVs. Our local TV critic
>>>>> publishes Q&As and one frequent question has to do with people having
>>>>> trouble hearing dialogue over background music. After years of telling
>>>>> people it had to be due to them growing older he figured out that the
>>>>> problem could well be the crappy quality of the speakers in today's sets. 
>>>>> I
>>>>> invested in a sound bar and it made a tremendous difference.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAH5J8ywvzm1_YSvDhFzVvZKz7XYkOWqMdsTc%2B8St3dLibDAHjg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to