Here's the problem with that: the people that know that already know it.
The people that don't know it don't care.

Here's a snippet:

Swan: Lyndon Johnson! He passed the Civil Rights Act.
Trump: Ask, ask: how has it worked out? If you take a look at what Lyndon
Johnson did. How has it worked out?
Swan: You think the Civil Rights Act was a mistake?

"Trump changed the subject back to his administration and the fact that
black unemployment was low. (Before it became very high.)"

If you argue that Swan should've tried to force Trump to answer that
question, then ask what the outcome of the answer would've been. Had Trump
given an honest answer (Yes), then we'd have said "He's exactly as racist
as we said he was" and they'd have said "And it *was* a huge mistake!". Had
Trump lied (no), then we'd have said "What a liar!" and they'd have said
"Trump's no dummy: he's not gonna talk bad about it."

By leaving that at that point, Swan did the job: he got Trump to question
one of the most significant pieces of civil rights legislation in the
country's history.

You want to hold Trump accountable. But here's the thing: narcissists
(especially sociopathic narcissists) don't believe they have to be held
accountable. They're too good for the rest of us. Speaking as someone whose
father married one: this woman couldn't find fault with herself if her life
hung in the balance. Accountability is for other people.

As for wanting something to be able to show to people and go "SEE? SEE?":
they don't see, because to see would be to admit they're as much of a piece
of shit as he is (or that they're proud to be as much of a piece of shit as
he is).


On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 3:55 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 1:26 PM Jon Delfin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 4:24 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> That said, this wasn’t an especially good interview... it’s just that
>>> the people who typically interview Trump are so bad at even basic follow-up
>>> questions or on-the-spot fact checking that it appears to be a great
>>> interview.
>>>
>>
>> What would you have had Swan do to make it a better interview?
>>
>
> What Swan did well was prepare questions and lead Trump into his usual
> lies, blustering, and non-answers. But that’s not difficult to do; asking
> Trump anything will almost guarantee a Trumpian non-answer. What needs to
> happen (and what I’d like to happen at the debates) is to keep pressing
> Trump not on his dumbass statements, and not even about the habitual lying,
> but about his actions and the actions taken by this administration. He’s
> enacted the most discriminatory policies in my lifetime. He’s plunged the
> nation deeper into debt (prior to Covid) faster than any point in my
> lifetime. He’s destroyed foreign policy... it genuinely does not exist.
> Long serving ranking members of government and the military have
> quit/resigned out of embarrassment at even being associated with Trump’s
> actions... that doesn’t get talked about enough. Instead of focusing on
> what he has said or proving (once again) how genuinely stupid Trump is, get
> into the substance. But if a reporter wanted to focus on Trump’s words, he
> has led verbal attacks on groups and individuals (the media being an
> obvious example) which directly led to murders of innocent people... that’s
> worthy of more than an hour of intense interrogation.
>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CABCcf4cup4YABAyeGGw1MjFJDr5OhYFkp7c4-e8UU7Smgoa%3Dmg%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CABCcf4cup4YABAyeGGw1MjFJDr5OhYFkp7c4-e8UU7Smgoa%3Dmg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4AKFXfNrkrkOUm%3D6%3D8j205h1hOAz_9%3D3aN7PbpUMb3oHA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4AKFXfNrkrkOUm%3D6%3D8j205h1hOAz_9%3D3aN7PbpUMb3oHA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CABru7%2BfaiRA%3D6b0vJ_4pEPFEdxs-OSqLyacZ2VV_z43TMqcTNA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to