Because if it was an actual place... a town? a business?... as opposed to, say, the Sinclair and/or Fox organizations, in which case they've obviously made their decisions, people in that place / business, since his words are now in the public sphere, *could* want to confront him as well. Also, as with other cases we've discussed here, we can't presume the line was just a spontaneous utterance, but was a response to something we didn't hear, from where or whom we might never know.
I'm *not* saying "exonerate him," but "find out who he responded to and bring them into the case." (Do I blame police procedurals for this? Maybe.) Doug Fields, to Jim Ellwanger, today (8/21): > I'm also not sure what that line is referring to, but I'm even more > curious to know why that would matter, even if it were correct? The phrase > used was offensive on its face, regardless of who (or where) it was > referring to. So how would confirming who (or where) was being discussed > be germane to whether or not Brennaman's suspension was deserved? > > > B -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/1d91d669-3cf9-40ac-b8d0-5359dc1e5fecn%40googlegroups.com.
