> I in turn am not sure in what context such a > mistake would not only be assumed to be > anti-Semitic, but not believed to be anything > but even when explained. Is there a perception > here that I have pre-dispositions in that > direction?
I did a lousy job of making my point, for which I apologize. To clarify: - If I'd thought PGage's post wasn't a typo and represented some sort of predisposition, I'd have said so, or at least asked directly off-list. - If the typo had been off by one letter, I'd have figured it out. But, even knowing about the Washington story, I didn't get to 'lewd,' which is indeed an appropriate description. - The thread that Joe referenced (that I'd forgotten about) is a broader example of what I was trying to say. It's much too easy to imagine autocorrect making something that the writer didn't intend. To bring it full circle, that's different than Brennaman saying what he said. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKSNnOH9XQ4L%2BPJ3WQCVzj-vL%3DW1%2BAq1QFTLd6A40O5jX0kRNQ%40mail.gmail.com.
