The LAT “Commentary” Is by Lorraine Ali, and was part of an ongoing thread
in which I was accused by someone of being in favor of pedophilia (though
they allowed that perhaps I was not an actual pedophile myself) for
criticizing the Farrow program. The piece is so embarrassingly flimsy that
I had to look up the author, thinking perhaps she was some lesser
functionary at the LAT. but no, she appears to be their main entertainment
editor, and has a fairly impressive resume.

I am not sure what is going on here, but I refuse  to start sentences with
“I’m not a pedophile, but I do have a few criticisms of XXX.”



On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 8:58 AM Paul Murray <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would add to Dave's list the accusation that anyone doubting the
> "evidence" is a paid shill from Allen's PR team.
>
> Boy, that LAT column is really cringeworthy.
>
> On Monday, March 15, 2021 at 4:41:43 AM UTC-4 Dave Sikula wrote:
>
>> While not being accused of being in favor of sexual abuse of children,
>> the majority of the posts I've seen on the show this week have fallen into
>> three main categories:
>>
>> 1) "Woody Allen is a creep, so of course he did it."
>> 2) "I never liked his movies, so of course he did it." ("Manhattan" is
>> usually cited here)
>> 3) "He married his stepdaughter (or daughter, in rare cases), so of
>> course he did it."
>>
>> Occasionally, an Allen supporter will show up (sometimes linking to the
>> "By the Way ..." video, sometimes to the Moses Farrow article, sometimes to
>> other videos), but they are invariably shouted down as supporting
>> pedophilia. The article in the LA Times today, with its "the reason Allen
>> supporters believe him is because they want women to shut up and be abused"
>> conclusion was a new low, even for the dog-trainer (which is as nothing
>> compared to the NY Times). The Daily Beast came close, though, with its
>> article that tarred Allen with the Jeffrey Epstein brush (including the
>> charge that he apparently supported Roman Polanski -- neglecting the small
>> detail that so did Mia Farrow).
>>
>> Most often, the Allen-haters remind me of nothing so much as Q
>> supporters, refusing to listen to counter-facts and evidence in favor of
>> the narrative they've been fed.
>>
>> Dylan Farrow seems to have no trouble talking about all of this now, so
>> why doesn't she take Allen to court and have it out once and for all? If he
>> were proven guilty, I'd have no qualms in wanting him locked up or -- more
>> likely -- fined heavily. Given the inconsistencies in the Farrow accounts,
>> though, and their abhorrence of being put under oath and questioned -- and
>> the attendant penalties for perjury -- I don't expect it.
>>
>> Allen's career is over. That's certain, so in that sense, the Farrows
>> have won. Even if he were definitively acquitted, the true believers would
>> claim the trial was rigged and no studio is going to finance him.
>>
>> --Dave Sikula
>>
>> On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 11:23:14 PM UTC-7 PGage wrote:
>>
>>> So, nobody not last named Allen is happier than I am that this HBO
>>> series is over. This week I have had the unique experience of both being
>>> accused of being in favor of the sexual abuse of children (by online
>>> interlocutors, not on this list) and spending a couple of hours reporting
>>> one of my patients for sexually abusing a child.
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/fd6188a0-b8a7-48c1-8ef9-8a85bd95d3b2n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/fd6188a0-b8a7-48c1-8ef9-8a85bd95d3b2n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYJ%2BqBC9q2_2Sr8v%2BJNZCcyuamA_LBZ2y3c7Tyk4Bmh1%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to