She may have been hoping for a windfall like that, but what she expected
was for Disney to honor the contract she signed that specified no streaming
for a certain number of weeks to protect the box office receipts that were
the main basis of her deal.

I have a friend who has been a working (meaning, struggling) actor for
20-something years who posted a blistering take down of ScarJo for her
lawsuit. His point was there were so many actors who would be happy to make
a “mere” $20M for the chance to work in a film. I understand his feelings,
and like him, so did not reply that I disagree with him. I might feel
differently if the extra money was going to below the line workers on the
film production, rather than Disney shareholders and executives.


On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 2:16 PM Steve Timko <[email protected]> wrote:

> I haven't read the thread Phineas shared, but the Cameron Diaz deal for
> "Bad Teacher" is well known. when ScarJo negotiated the deal, this is
> probably what she was expecting. Enough money she never had to work again.
>
>
> https://www.businessinsider.com/16-of-the-highest-paid-movie-roles-of-all-time-2018-5#14-cameron-diaz-as-elizabeth-halsey-in-bad-teacher-7
>
> $42 million
>
> Source: Yahoo Finance
> <https://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/the-10-best-deals-ever-struck-by-hollywood-actors-141916181.html>
>
> Diaz was paid a mere $1 million to get "Bad Teacher" produced, but
> received a portion of box-office earnings, which secured her over $40
> million for the movie. It's known as one of the most "legendary" deals
> <https://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/the-10-best-deals-ever-struck-by-hollywood-actors-141916181.html>
>  in
> Hollywood history.
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:29 PM PGage <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There is a larger, and more interesting, issue at stake here, though
>> creative Hollywood accounting is part of it.
>>
>> I highly recommend the account available at this tweet by Matt Bellini,
>> former editor at The Hollywood Reporter and entertainment lawyer, who has
>> been all over this evolving story.
>>
>>           https://twitter.com/mattbelloni/status/1420802198724698119?s=21
>>
>> Basically, the pandemic accelerated the transition of the finances of the
>> film industry from being based on ticket sales to streaming revenue. He
>> says film studios are now basically streamers. Problem is blockbusters
>> being released now had their deals with “talent” based on the old model,
>> but are being released in the new environment.
>>
>> The main problem is not really creative accounting, though in a new way
>> that is part of it. The old style creative accounting was mostly about how
>> ro define net profits, but big stars these days structure deals based on
>> gross revenues, so that is less of an issue, as ticket sales are (kind of)
>> verifiable. But there is no way currently to independently access streaming
>> and subscription numbers. Bellini recommends that going forward talent
>> build in contract language giving them the right to independently audit
>> streaming and subscription data.
>>
>> The real problem Bellini says is a new divergence between the financial
>> interest of Talent, whose deals are tied to box office, and studios, whose
>> profit is now tied primarily to streaming subscriptions. Studios have been
>> streaming blockbusters early, reducing ticket sales, but boosting streaming
>> subscribers.
>>
>>  Warner had a similar problem earlier in the year, and after initially
>> lowballing its talent, came up with significant additional payments. Disney
>> has been significantly more Dickish, even though stars’ contracts (as
>> ScarJo’s does) often specifically preclude quick release of films to
>> streaming.
>>
>> So ScarJo’s suit is not about getting paid fir this film (though it is
>> about that of course) but also about trying to curtail attempts by big
>> studios to unilaterally grab a larger share of film revenues under the new
>> model.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 3:33 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I worked in Hollywood for five years, and the single biggest lesson I
>>> learned is to always get paid in advance. I can’t believe she’s been in the
>>> business for over a quarter of a century without learning that lesson.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 3:20 PM 'Bob Jersey' via TVorNotTV <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> “Disney chose to placate Wall Street investors and pad its bottom line,
>>>> rather than allow its subsidiary Marvel to comply with the agreement,”
>>>> attys argue in a breach-of-contract action filed today (7/29) in L.A....
>>>> WSJ, who first reported the suit, estimated about $50mil in lost bonuses...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://variety.com/2021/film/news/scarlett-johansson-sues-disney-black-widow-1235030582/
>>>>  (link)
>>>>
>>>> B
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/878fb2dd-7352-4c6e-a753-25f778a97ebbn%40googlegroups.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/878fb2dd-7352-4c6e-a753-25f778a97ebbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4AJ%3Dm_HcXa_EHVVJ597h0Sy8N2V5%2BUE%3Duc9eJpdjJbKfQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4AJ%3Dm_HcXa_EHVVJ597h0Sy8N2V5%2BUE%3Duc9eJpdjJbKfQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYKibcAbO9YOcwobOMFNzmN%3DzuuqzKOXOUZ-dkq7w20AuQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYKibcAbO9YOcwobOMFNzmN%3DzuuqzKOXOUZ-dkq7w20AuQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAH5J8yxk48uJH8MCkbpETVynkjg1EiLaVt62nYcTAevZqAFdVA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAH5J8yxk48uJH8MCkbpETVynkjg1EiLaVt62nYcTAevZqAFdVA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYKomD%2BW1vTyWLZeQ4DdkXuHu2TkH9RdDfkA-k30dMfFDA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to