The CFL rule is that a ball kicked into the end zone, and not brought out, results in a single point. It's not necessarily after a touchdown.
I'll note that the CFL has the loss of down for delay of game penalty, but only in the last three minutes of each half. That's particularly damaging given that the CFL only has 3 downs. John On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 16:38, 'Bob Jersey' via TVorNotTV < [email protected]> wrote: > My ideas would speed up the regulation game, and reduce the possibiility > of OT. > -- Play-clock violation = loss of down, not yardage > -- Replace half-the-distance penalties with TDs or safeties, as applicable > -- Award TDs for defensive pass interference in end zone > -- If an interception (in-field and beyond line of scrimmage) is not > advanced, next play is at previous line of scrimmage > -- In regular-season games, tie = loss for both teams, not half-and-half, > 'cuz neither team won > I am still in favor of the CFL's "single" after TDs coming south, as I > have been since seeing my first rouge scored thanks to ESPN generations > ago, but won't pursue it here. B > > PGage, to David Lynch and moi, Jan 24th: > >> I despise the College rule. >> >> I was not crazy about moving to the current rule, but it was justified by >> the large advantage the receiving team has in scoring a FG. A team that >> played decent defense and stopped a TD often still lost. That is no longer >> true, and I think the current rule works pretty well. If you don’t want to >> lose on the first TD of OT, win in regulation, of okay better defense. >> >> Now, the alternative that does make sense is that, in the post-season, >> play extra quarters (maybe at shorter intervals), like the NBA does. That >> would risk the first game of a postseason schedule day bleeding over >> against the second, which they really don’t want, plus football is hard >> enough that the injury risks associated with potentially 20 or 30 minutes >> of additional play may be significant. >> >> As a Chiefs fan who felt royally screwed after the 2018 (January 2019) >>> AFC championship came down to a very similar-feeling OT win by the >>> Patriots, not even being on the other side of that equation has changed my >>> opinion that the first possession shouldn't be sudden death. I think the >>> current system is fine for the regular season, but I'd like to see both >>> teams given a chance on offense/required to play defense when there's more >>> at stake. >>> >>> For me, it would just be a matter of changing the current rule to be the >>> game not ending on the first drive in the event of a field goal or a >>> touchdown by the team on offense. No need to go all the way to college >>> style overtime, which I've seen some propose. >>> >>> If one has to do with Overtime, I reject it sight unseen. It sucks for >>>> the Bills that Josh did not get to touch the ball in OT, but defense is >>>> part of the game too… >>>> >>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TVorNotTV" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/f3cee26e-0065-43fb-81bd-411b97e123f7n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/f3cee26e-0065-43fb-81bd-411b97e123f7n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- John Edwards "You can insure against the weather, but you can't insure against incompetence, can you?" - Phil Tufnell -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJLXtM%2BojKtGWrQ%3DfE6hCVm6c6CGC9%3Du9tU6QsBoJg30xKHyzQ%40mail.gmail.com.
