As I’ve argued before, your thesis is both too dichotomous and too easy
going. The integrity of the game is a continuum, not digital, and has been
more or less compromised for more than 60 years, not just the handful of
years gambling has been a direct source of revenue. The truth is that the
billions of dollars spent gambling on football each year has long been a
primary source of interest in the NFL, and is a huge part of what drives
its TV ratings (which of course is where it makes most of its profit).

But that is besides the main point. I agree with the gist of what Kevin
writes. There is so much to despise about the NFL, but the self righteous,
corrupt hypocrisy that runs through its sinews and veins is fundamental to
what is rotten. Witness Commissioner Roger Goodall’s condemnation of
Ridley, who bet $1100 and is going to lose his $11.1 million salary next
year, while the NFL pockets ~$6.4 Billion from TV next year, fueled to a
large extent by gambling:

“There is nothing more fundamental to the NFL’s success — and to the
reputation of everyone associated with our league — than upholding the
integrity of the game. This is the responsibility of every player, coach,
owner, game official, and anyone else employed in the league. Your actions
put the integrity of the game at risk, threatened to damage public
confidence in professional football, and potentially undermined the
reputations of your fellow players throughout the NFL.”

On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 at 1:17 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:

> I restate my thesis from a while back: The moment gambling became a direct
> source of revenue for professional sports, nothing about the games can be
> considered honest or reputable. As such, it doesn’t matter that players are
> openly betting, as the corruption is already de facto part of the system.
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 1:02 PM 'Bob Jersey' via TVorNotTV <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The system of validating betting partners came with the requirement that
>> any participant must be checked to verify that they aren't a stakeholder
>> (player, office holder, executive, owner)
>>
>> That, naturally, doesn't stop someone from bending the rules, just like
>> on the field.     B
>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/853157bd-66ed-4cd9-a964-e7841f558f6en%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/853157bd-66ed-4cd9-a964-e7841f558f6en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4Bg%2BvJ4mEspWoNaqVbkLkvKz3L0m-eczFQjQEg77G8X3Q%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4Bg%2BvJ4mEspWoNaqVbkLkvKz3L0m-eczFQjQEg77G8X3Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYJyMW21D7XOxoaijgRLYeCoGwJM2xaA%3DexRAga7THF1vQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to