The passing of Anton Yelchin (Chekov) made it harder for me to feel that a fourth film was necessary. It's also been more than six years since the last film, so even if they do get another film going, they're effectively restarting things. David
On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 02:36:47 PM PDT, M-D November <[email protected]> wrote: Speaking as a Trekker...meh. As much as I felt like the Kelvin timeline finally found its footing with "Star Trek Beyond" (stronger Kirk/Spock/McCoy dynamic, punchy script, not using the crutch of rehashing a prime-timeline story), the launch of the 1701-A (Kelvin) at the end of the film also felt like a decent way to tie up those stories. I have to imagine, too, that it's hard to come up with a solid story to tell in the Kelvin timeline when the prime timeline is just WAY more interesting thanks in no small part to "Strange New Worlds"... On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 4:41:50 PM UTC-4 Bob Jersey wrote: Till they find a new director, at least... Matt Shakman was lured away to Marvel, who courted him to replace Spider-Man: No Way Out helmer Jon Watts...https://variety.com/2022/film/news/star-trek-sequel-removed-paramount-film-slate-1235386228/ (link) B -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/639613792.1235499.1664437308418%40mail.yahoo.com.
