> Very long (9000 words) and very long awaited. I found it was easy to get > around the Atlantic paywall be accessing it through the many links on > Twitter (is it always that easy to get around paywalls?).
1. I had no problem when I originally brought the article up with one of those Twitter links, and just copied the URL from that tab. If I thought there would be an issue, I'd have said something. My apologies for the link not acting the way I expected it to. 2. Not too surprisingly, the effectiveness of paywalls varies. In many cases, clicking on Reader View in Firefox is sufficient. (Sometimes reloading is required.) And there are plenty of publications where there's no simple way to get around the paywall. I wouldn't post anything here that I couldn't read easily, or that I thought people would have a problem with. And, despite (or even because of) its length, I thought this was a terrific look at the state of CNN. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKSNnOHnnasSGQ391CPnvdRMJ9-D-8xHtSVtFUFp%2BFAN6yNAUw%40mail.gmail.com.
