Retrying him will be a DA’s or AG’s call and they’re elected offices. If
there’s no blowback to declining to prosecute the case again they might let
it go.

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 9:54 PM David Risner <[email protected]> wrote:

> My big question is, why spend all that money retrying him when he's
> already going to die in prison for other convictions?
>
> Let him rot away like the worm he is and don't let him have any more
> control over anyone else's lives.
>
>
>
> --
> David Risner
> ------------------------------
> *From:* PGage <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2024 4:49 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: New York appeals court torn over
> reversing Weinstein convictoin
>
> I agree with the Court of Appeals, but I don’t think the fault lies with
> the NY Prosecutors, but the trial judge. Even then, it was a close call,
> and the Appeals court was closely and bitterly divided. I do think when
> things are that close the decision should be in favor of the defendant.
>
> Weinstein will still do his time in California, even if they decide not to
> retry him in NY.
>
>
>
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 2:53 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Could somebody get the NY prosecutors a refresher course in proper
>> courtroom procedure? Either that or make them wear shirts in public with
>> the words “I help sexual predators get out of prison” printed on them?
>>
>> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:48 PM 'Bob Jersey' via TVorNotTV <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> "Front page" at V... the panel ruled 4-3 for Weinstein, finding that the
>>> NY judge prejudicially allowed women to testify about allegations that
>>> weren't in the original case (he remains jailed, as an appeal is
>>> planned)... the issue of "prior bad acts" also led to the overturning of
>>> Bill Cosby's case, tho on different grounds...
>>>
>>> https://variety.com/2024/film/news/harvey-weinstein-rape-conviction-overturned-new-york-1235981890/
>>>  (link)
>>> Next stop, California, where the defense plans to make a comparable case
>>> for tossing that conviction...
>>>
>>> https://variety.com/2024/film/news/harvey-weinstein-prison-overturned-conviction-explained-1235982257/
>>>  (link)
>>> B
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 10:54:16 PM UTC-5 [email protected]
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> NEW YORK (AP) — Nearly four years after Harvey Weinstein was convicted
>>>> of rape
>>>> <https://apnews.com/article/ap-top-news-harvey-weinstein-sexual-assault-ca-state-wire-us-news-67057b46fcd3f1183cf6a699a399c886>
>>>>  and
>>>> sent to prison, New York’s highest court appeared torn at oral arguments
>>>> Wednesday about potentially overturning the landmark #MeToo-era verdict.
>>>>
>>>> Weinstein’s lawyers urged the state’s Court of Appeals to dismiss the
>>>> disgraced movie mogul’s 2020 conviction, arguing that the trial judge,
>>>> James Burke, trampled his right to a fair trial
>>>> <https://apnews.com/article/legal-proceedings-new-york-city-crime-metoo-manhattan-f20f473c61d348719cf7b269932419ca>
>>>>  with
>>>> pro-prosecution rulings that turned the trial into “1-800-GET-HARVEY.”
>>>>
>>>> “It was his character that was on trial. It wasn’t the evidence that
>>>> was on trial,” Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala told the seven-member court
>>>> in Albany.
>>>>
>>>> Weinstein, 71, was convicted of a criminal sex act for forcibly
>>>> performing oral sex on a TV and film production assistant in 2006 and rape
>>>> in the third degree for an attack on an aspiring actress in 2013. He was 
>>>> sentenced
>>>> to 23 years in prison
>>>> <https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/weinstein-sentenced-to-23-years-for-sexual-assaults>.
>>>> Last year, he was convicted in Los Angeles
>>>> <https://apnews.com/article/harvey-weinstein-verdict-los-angeles-rape-trial-1a3a9db4e4589a9e0fb03214bc01fecf>
>>>>  of
>>>> another rape and sentenced to an additional 16 years in prison
>>>> <https://apnews.com/article/harvey-weinstein-sentencing-los-angeles-c287c5fe310c1f125086207be2916a3e>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> A lawyer for the Manhattan district attorney’s office, which prosecuted
>>>> Weinstein’s New York case, told the appeals court that Burke's rulings were
>>>> proper and the conviction should stand.
>>>>
>>>> Weinstein’s lawyers want a new trial, but only for the criminal sexual
>>>> act charge. They argue the rape charge can’t be retried because it involves
>>>> alleged conduct outside the statute of limitations. Reversing the verdict
>>>> would reopen a painful chapter in America’s reckoning with sexual
>>>> misconduct by powerful figures. The court is unlikely to rule immediately.
>>>>
>>>> If the Court of Appeals were to rule in Weinstein's favor, he would
>>>> remain locked up because of his California conviction. Weinstein did not
>>>> attend the arguments but was said to be monitoring a livestream from the
>>>> state prison where he is incarcerated, Mohawk Correctional Facility, about
>>>> 100 miles (160 kilometers) northwest of Albany.
>>>>
>>>> Allegations against Weinstein, the once powerful and feared studio boss
>>>> behind such Oscar winners as “Pulp Fiction” and “Shakespeare in Love,” 
>>>> ushered
>>>> in the #MeToo movement
>>>> <https://apnews.com/arts-and-entertainment-general-news-2a32a7bc96a0756d7699e0fb690731b8>.
>>>> His New York trial drew intense publicity, with protesters chanting
>>>> “rapist” outside the courthouse
>>>> <https://apnews.com/article/new-york-trials-harvey-weinstein-manhattan-courts-4535e9bf0c8affed775236f58e6be4d5>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Weinstein maintains his innocence. He contends any sexual activity was
>>>> consensual.
>>>>
>>>> His voice booming at times, Aidala argued that Burke swayed the trial
>>>> with two key decisions: allowing three women to testify about allegations
>>>> that weren't part of the case, and granting prosecutors permission to
>>>> confront him, if he had testified, about his long history of brutish
>>>> behavior. Aidala also took issue with Burke’s refusal to remove a juror who
>>>> had written a novel involving predatory older men.
>>>>
>>>> Weinstein wanted to testify at his trial, but opted against it because
>>>> of Burke’s ruling that would've meant answering questions about more than
>>>> two-dozen alleged acts of misbehavior dating back four decades, including
>>>> fights with his movie producer brother and an incident in which he flipped
>>>> over a table in anger, Aidala said.
>>>>
>>>> “We had a defendant who was begging to tell his side of the story. It’s
>>>> a he said, she said case, and he’s saying ‘that’s not how it happened. Let
>>>> me tell you how I did it,’” Aidala argued, adding that evidence of
>>>> Weinstein’s prior bad behavior, "had nothing to do with truth and veracity.
>>>> It was all 'he’s a bad guy.'”
>>>>
>>>> Aidala also argued that other defendants in the state were now at risk
>>>> of having their cases overwhelmed by extraneous evidence because “the
>>>> floodgates have been opened” by the precedent of Burke’s rulings.
>>>>
>>>> The judges hearing Wednesday’s arguments volleyed between skepticism
>>>> and sympathy for Aidala and his counterpart from the district attorney's
>>>> office, appellate chief, Steven Wu.
>>>>
>>>> Judge Madeline Singas suggested that the circumstances of Weinstein’s
>>>> case — using his power in Hollywood to have sex with women seeking his help
>>>> — may have warranted Burke's decision to allow the other accusers to
>>>> testify.
>>>>
>>>> But Judge Jenny Rivera wondered if the behavior the women described
>>>> cleared the high legal bar for allowing additional accusers to take the
>>>> stand, namely that their testimony is evidence of same motive, opportunity,
>>>> intent or a common scheme or plan.
>>>>
>>>> “What’s unique about a powerful man trying to get a woman to have sex
>>>> with them?" Rivera asked.
>>>>
>>>> Betsy Barros, a lower court judge filling in on the Court of Appeals
>>>> because of recusals, appeared alarmed by Burke’s ruling allowing
>>>> prosecutors to confront Weinstein about unrelated misbehavior.
>>>>
>>>> “I don’t think anybody in their right mind would testify" under those
>>>> circumstances, Barros observed. “So how is this a fair trial when you’re
>>>> not able to put in your side of it?”
>>>>
>>>> Aidala said allowing the additional accusers to testify turned
>>>> Weinstein’s trial “into three other mini-trials," burdening jurors with
>>>> deciding not only Weinstein’s guilt or innocence on the charges at hand but
>>>> whether he committed other alleged offenses that weren't part of the case.
>>>> Weinstein was acquitted in Los Angeles on charges involving one of the
>>>> women who testified in New York, Aidala said.
>>>>
>>>> Wu countered that Weinstein’s acquittal on the most serious charges in
>>>> the Manhattan trial — two counts of predatory sexual assault and a
>>>> first-degree rape charge stemming from actor Annabella Sciorra’s
>>>> allegations of a mid-1990s rape — showed that jurors were paying attention.
>>>>
>>>> The Associated Press does not generally identify people alleging sexual
>>>> assault unless they consent to be named; Sciorra has spoken publicly about
>>>> her allegations.
>>>>
>>>> The Court of Appeals agreed last year to take Weinstein’s case
>>>> <https://apnews.com/article/new-york-harvey-weinstein-eae103d055013888317f92c6c0dfad6c>
>>>>  after
>>>> an intermediate appeals court upheld his conviction
>>>> <https://apnews.com/article/harvey-weinstein-conviction-upheld-1dc4db0787bfd4a94268ef0ed6ea4803>.
>>>> Prior to their ruling, judges on the lower appellate court had raised
>>>> doubts about Burke’s conduct during oral arguments. One observed that that
>>>> Burke had let prosecutors pile on with “incredibly prejudicial
>>>> testimony”
>>>> <https://apnews.com/article/bill-cosby-arts-and-entertainment-new-york-manhattan-harvey-weinstein-0c22166b1108d72b9fc2d8a0865df27a>
>>>>  from
>>>> additional witnesses.
>>>>
>>>> Burke’s term expired at the end of 2022. He was not reappointed and is
>>>> no longer a judge.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/f4238ce8-c502-4971-8f64-aed4d0b6804bn%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/f4238ce8-c502-4971-8f64-aed4d0b6804bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4A-f1j%3DaNNRDAcBL6hXV%2BVp%2BSJbheAtowD_Z3NHMLs5HA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKgmY4A-f1j%3DaNNRDAcBL6hXV%2BVp%2BSJbheAtowD_Z3NHMLs5HA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYJoGh4-jtrWcgcaD%3DUOKJDimuxEnkOmBGKjYxi9LgbQuw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYJoGh4-jtrWcgcaD%3DUOKJDimuxEnkOmBGKjYxi9LgbQuw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TVorNotTV" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/nunjjb69tsucsui4lo45fogh.1714096467404%40email.android.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/nunjjb69tsucsui4lo45fogh.1714096467404%40email.android.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAJE-FiEgLn%2BFhf6ptgHtGZyd2WLc_CdeoL%3Dq8tyFinm%2BrYfmTA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to