Not to mention that the right-leaning SCOTUS may have already preempted any case Musk has via Citizens United's "money = speech" doctrine. If ad spending is protected speech, then Musk (or, say, Byron Allen) can't force anyone to advertise with him.
On Tuesday, August 6, 2024 at 8:00:05 PM UTC-4 Kevin M. wrote: > He wants to force businesses to pay for his hate speech > > As always, I look forward to the discovery process as Twitter would have > to open up its records, which of course it won’t do, so the case will be > dismissed with prejudice > > > https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-x-lawsuit-advertisers-boycott-antitrust-2024-8 > > > Kevin M. (RPCV) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/a09a7e3a-4634-4bf1-958f-40c5d1a73eb9n%40googlegroups.com.
